Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

A primer on selection, installation and testing. Which type of duct smoke detector is preferred for HVAC applications, photoelectric or ionization?

0
Posted

A primer on selection, installation and testing. Which type of duct smoke detector is preferred for HVAC applications, photoelectric or ionization?

0

Photoelectric detection is preferred for several reasons, including: 1. Detection Capability — Photoelectric detection responds better to the larger smoke particles found in ductwork during a fire. 2. NFPA Recommends Photoelectric — The National Fire Alarm Code Standard 72, section A.5.14.4.2 explicitly states, “In almost every fire scenario in an air-handling system, the point of detection will be some distance from the fire source, therefore, the smoke will be cooler and more visible because of the growth of sub-micron particles into larger particles due to agglomeration and recombination. For these reasons, photoelectric detection technology has advantages over ionization detection technology in air duct system applications.” 3. Environmental Immunity — High humidity and condensation can cause false alarms with ionization detectors. Photoelectric detectors operate more efficiently, generating fewer false alarms. 4. Industry Preferred — Photoelectric detection is preferred by the fir

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.