Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Arbitrators get paid for their time, but judges do not. Why is arbitration less expensive?

0
Posted

Arbitrators get paid for their time, but judges do not. Why is arbitration less expensive?

0

Arbitration decreases the time needed to resolve a dispute. This can dramatically reduce legal fees that would have been incurred during a lengthy court case. In arbitration, discovery proceedings (e.g., depositions, document discovery, interrogatories, etc.) are frequently limited. Discovery in a court case, often the most expensive component of litigation, may be extensive. Furthermore, motion practice—a common strategy in a court case—is significantly limited. All of these elements substantially reduce costs of arbitration compared to a trial.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.