Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Are Balanced Four-Ball Pairings Optimal?

April 26, 2017balanced four-ball optimal pairings

0

Posted

Are Balanced Four-Ball Pairings Optimal?

1 Answer

0

Posted

Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 2007, vol. 3, issue 4 Abstract: In the 2004 Ryder Cup Matches, US Captain Hal Sutton decided to pair his two best players, Tiger Woods and Phil Mickelson, in the opening four-ball match. The popular press characterized this pairing with the adjectives “bold” and “risky” since it is generally thought that balanced teams are preferable to unbalanced. In this paper I compare a Balanced strategy (matching stronger players with weaker players so that the resulting pairs are balanced) against an Unbalanced strategy (matching stronger players with stronger players and weaker players with weaker players) and find the Balanced strategy to be superior, but only slightly so. Keywords: Golf; golf; Ryder Cup; probability; simulation (search for similar items in EconPapers) Date: 2007 View list of references Track citations by RSS feed Downloads: (external link) http://www.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1073&context=jqas (application/pdf) Relate