Can decision analysis help us decide whether ultrasound screening for fetal anomalies is worth it?
Decision analysis is a widely used tool to improve clinical decision making when randomized controlled trials are infeasible, underpowered, or lack generalizability. We performed an exploratory decision analysis of routine second trimester ultrasound to detect fetal anomalies, focusing on the assumptions that would have the greatest impact. Six outcome categories were considered: (1) abnormal ultrasound, anomalous child, (2) abnormal ultrasound, elective abortion of anomalous fetus, (3) abnormal ultrasound, healthy child, (4) abnormal ultrasound, elective abortion of healthy fetus, (5) normal ultrasound, healthy child, and (6) normal ultrasound, anomalous child. Live birth and fetal death rates for nine sonographically detectable anomalies were obtained from the California Birth Defects Monitoring Program. The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound were estimated through meta-analysis of recent series. Plausible ranges for the probabilities of cesarean delivery and elective abortion
Related Questions
- We use the resume to evaluate applicants and decide which one to invite for an interview. How does AccuHire help us make this decision if resumes aren the main decision point?
- Does Fetal Fibronectin and Ultrasound Cervical Length Help in the Evaluation of Women With Suspected Preterm Labor?
- Can ultrasound help decide if they are identical twins?
