Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Can sovereignty or democratic self-government be “shared” or “pooled” in a transnational authority?

0
Posted

Can sovereignty or democratic self-government be “shared” or “pooled” in a transnational authority?

0

Sovereignty essentially means self-government, a particular people makes its own political decisions. Logically, it is not possible to “share” self-government – that is the ability to rule yourselves – if you cede democratic authority to a political or judicial body that is not responsible or accountable to your own citizens. For example, if ten countries are “pooling sovereignty,” what happens when some nations disagree with the joint decision of the others? If these nations go along with the joint decision against the wishes of their own people, they are no longer sovereign because they no longer rule themselves, but are, in effect, ruled by those outside of their democratic system. Global governance/transnationalism will not be more effective at addressing global problems than liberal democratic nation-states led by the United States When human rights were threatened in the Balkans it was democratic nation-states led by the United States under the auspices of NATO, not the UN or any

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.