Could someone please help me out here? Is M$ Windows just a really bad alteration and back engineered version of the original UNIX?
Fact – M$ Windows was once purely programmed on UNIX machines using UNIX and C/C++. That’s a fact. So – since UNIX compilers were or are making M$ Windows – isn’t it just another version of UNIX in with a different name and cloak? M$ tied their version of Xerox Windows idea into the Widnows 95 (UNIX compiled M$ OS) and made it peranently tied to the kernel…which is unlike the original M$ Windows 3.0 and still the character of KDE and GNOME – which are still unconnected directly to the kernel. So – doesn’t that make M$ Windows really an OS by UNIX? Hmmm…Microsoft Winux…that’s what it should be called. Unix with a M$ version Windowing system on top and permanently connected to the kernel. When KDE and GNOME become permanently connected to the Linux Kernel – can we call it Linows. One way or another – the public should get to the bottom of where all of the technology that Bill Gates claims to have created – really came from.
