Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Couldn’t DNA have evolved, given enough time and the necessary chemicals?

0
Posted

Couldn’t DNA have evolved, given enough time and the necessary chemicals?

0

Evolution requires replication and replication requires DNA to exist first. Evolution is not possible without self-replication. Self-replication is not possible without a code (Computer science pioneer John Von Neumann determined that in the 1960’s.) So evolution requires DNA to exist FIRST. Evolution is not a valid explanation for the origin of DNA or the genetic code. Q: DNA is just a molecule that obeys the laws of physics and chemistry. A: No, it is a communication system that follows the genetic code, which cannot be derived from the laws of physics and chemistry. Hubert Yockey in his book “Information Theory, Evolution and the Origin of Life” (Cambridge University Press, 2005) said, “The reason that there are principles of biology that cannot be derived from the laws of physics and chemistry lies simply in the fact that the genetic information content of the genome for constructing even the simplest organisms is much larger than the information content of these laws. The existenc

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.