Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Darwins theory of evolution with small incremental steps is somewhat more plausible or tenable if there were 4.6 billion years to act than six thousand years?

0
Posted

Darwins theory of evolution with small incremental steps is somewhat more plausible or tenable if there were 4.6 billion years to act than six thousand years?

0

A. It’s sometimes said by creationists that evolution itself can’t be tested, can’t falsified, and of course this is an example to show just why that’s wrong. If the world is really only six thousand years old, that would falsify evolution.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.