Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Did California Arnold Schwarzenegger Adhering to Fanatic Repubs Economic Theories Cause $7.6 Billions in Red?

0
Posted

Did California Arnold Schwarzenegger Adhering to Fanatic Repubs Economic Theories Cause $7.6 Billions in Red?

0

No, I don’t think so. First of all, I am no fan of the GOP and the policies and politics of the last many years as the federal ‘tax cuts’ were basically sleight of hand that left many states with unfunded mandates that had to be funded by new sources of revenue and program cuts. California might be further in the hole than a lot of the other states but I don’t think Schwarzenegger ‘adhered’ to the party’s economic theories as much as your question assumes. On the other hand, I do concur that exclusive adherance to supply side economic theory for almost 30 years resulted in an economic imbalance and the meltdown we are currently experiencing. So…hmmm…you may be right. Maybe I would say a more accurate phrasing would be ‘contributed to’ rather than ’caused’ the deficit in California, more than some, and less than other governors in their own states around the country. And perhaps I might not have chosen ‘fanatic’ to describe Rebpubs who subscribed to supply side economics to the excl

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.