Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Did the trial court reversibly err by failing to file findings of fact and conclusions of law?

0
Posted

Did the trial court reversibly err by failing to file findings of fact and conclusions of law?

0

In her first issue, Lynne contends the trial court reversibly erred by failing to file findings of fact and conclusions of law. Lynne claims she cannot determine the trial court=s reasons for its rulings in the final order. Lynne timely requested findings of fact and conclusions of law after the trial court signed its order modifying the parent-child relationship and awarding attorney=s fees as child support. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 296. The trial court failed to make findings or conclusions within the allotted time, and Lynne timely filed a notice of past-due findings of fact and conclusions of law. No findings or conclusions were ever made.

Thanksgiving questions

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.