|
Even though regulators are calling on broker-dealers to employ stricter hiring standards when it comes to screening brokers who have already gotten in trouble for alleged broker misconduct, many firms continue to hire these suspect workers. It doesn’t help that broker-dealers have a tendency to not reveal key details when a registered representative leaves the company under suspect circumstances in order limit the firm's liability from potential investor lawsuits and arbitration claims. For example, in 2003, Jeffrey Southard was working for American Express Financial Advisers (now Ameriprise Financial Inc.) when he was accused of selling unregistered securities and combining client funds with his own money. At the time, Southard accused American Express Financial Advisors of falsely accusing him of misdeeds and acting unprofessionally by violating his personal confidentiality. He left the firm to join Gunn-Allen Financial Inc. In July 2008, GunnAllen fired him. Last month, the New ...
more
|
Do Broker-Dealers Hire Brokers Already Suspected of Securities Fraud?
Related Questions
- "I don't know of an effective way to get that information," Mr. Shain said. "I don't come at this from the ...
- Oregon requires proof of passing scores on two examinations. One exam must be a "blue sky" exam (Series 63 or ...
- Yes. However, broker-dealers who are not currently FCMs or IBs can notice-register as FCMs or IBs if they are ...
- Broker Dealers are required to maintain all books and records as required under Securities Exchange Act Rules ...
- No. Auditors of non-public broker-dealers must continue to comply with Exchange Act Rule 17a-5(f)(3), which ...