Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Do OSSIE Devices typify the SCAs definition of a System Component, which uses Base Device Interfaces?

0
Posted

Do OSSIE Devices typify the SCAs definition of a System Component, which uses Base Device Interfaces?

0

While OSSIE uses the Base Device Interfaces, again, the limitation is in our usage of the Domain Profiles. As seen in the SCAv2.2.2 Extensions for CF::Devices, the JTRS notion of a logical device is different from the usage of a device in OSSIE. For OSSIE, a device interface is exactly that, an interface to access a particular device whose implementation is encapsulated within a CF::Device sub-type. OSSIE provides device interfaces to a GPP (in the form of a CF::ExecutableDevice?), a USRPv1.0 (in the form of a CF::Resource), and will soon provide interfaces to FPGAs and DSPs. What you will not find are logical representations of, say, an RS-232 device, or Ethernet.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.