Does open reduction increase the chance of infection during intramedullary nailing of closed tibial shaft fractures?
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether an open technique used to obtain reduction during intramedullary nailing of closed tibial shaft fractures increases the risk of infection, compared to closed reduction and nailing. SETTING: University level 1 trauma center. DESIGN: Retrospective database analysis. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: One hundred seventeen patients with 119 fractures from our trauma database who had sufficient follow-up and met study criteria. The patients were grouped by open versus closed reduction. Only OTA fracture types 42 A to C were included in this study. INTERVENTION: Locked reamed intramedullary nailing for closed tibial shaft fractures accomplished through either open or closed reduction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: The presence or absence of infection as determined by the clinical presentation (erythema, warmth, purulent drainage, fevers, chills, increased pain at the fracture site), indicative laboratory work (complete blood count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive p
Related Questions
- Does using Web-based email increase the chance for a virus infection? How can we protect ourselves from rogue attachments?
- Does open reduction increase the chance of infection during intramedullary nailing of closed tibial shaft fractures?
- Does infection with HIV virus increase susceptibility to blastomycosis?
