Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Does Teaching Intelligent Design as Science Undermine the Public School Science Curriculum?

0
Posted

Does Teaching Intelligent Design as Science Undermine the Public School Science Curriculum?

0

Yes the scientific method is the basis for science literacy. It teaches students how to observe data, perform experiments and form scientific theories the fundamentals of science. Students need these essential skills to succeed in advanced science classes, at university and medical school, and in all science based careers. Intelligent design is not a part of science it cannot be confirmed or denied by the scientific method. Teaching it as science confuses and misinforms students about the scientific method, thereby depriving them of a high-quality science education and possible career options. Are There Appropriate Settings for Teaching Intelligent Design? Yes human understanding is not limited to science. Throughout our history we have also advanced our understanding of ourselves and the world around us by developing religion, philosophy and myth. These subjects have traditionally struggled with questions that raise matters beyond human perception and intelligence. Intelligent design

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.