Does the experimental design make sense?
We want to convey three points in this section of the proposal. 1. We make clear what experiments we plan to conduct. 2. We say why we plan to do these experiments. 3. We tell the reviewers what gains will emerge from these experiments. As with all sections of our proposals, this needs to be startlingly clear. Many proposals begin with a few small paragraphs on the general methodologies that will support all the work. Throughout the proposal we can refer to these methods as appropriate for individual experiments. We try to express our experiments in straightforward, simple language so the information can be filed in the reader’s mind in an easy way. Many proposals have one experiment for each major objective in the proposal, then develop sub-experiments that give the detailed work plans. After listing the experiment, we can give a little background from the literature to show why the experiment is important. We want to create a sort of balance here: give enough information to make the
Related Questions
- It makes sense that the LED design allows for excellent reliability, but is there other advantages to their compact and simplistic design?
- What are the differences between correlational design, quasi-experimental design, and experimental design?
- Where Does the Experimental Design Evaluation of Upward Bound Fit In?
