Does the use of CatExpress qualify as contributing holdings to WorldCat, even though a library may not be providing all of their holdings to OCLC?
Libraries that contribute holdings through CatExpress do qualify as meeting this condition, even if this does not represent 100 percent of their cataloging activity. (The same rule applies to libraries that contribute holdings via Batch Processing, WorldCat Cataloging Partners, Connexion, CONTENTdm or Language Sets).
Related Questions
- My library is not part of a consortium. Can I choose a consortium I know is familiar to my users as the second tier of holdings displayed in my WorldCat Local implementation?
- Does the use of CatExpress qualify as contributing holdings to WorldCat, even though a library may not be providing all of their holdings to OCLC?
- I don’t catalog my holdings with OCLC. How will my library benefit from WorldCat Local "quick start"?
