Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Doesn’t causality go in the opposite direction – more social problems leading to wider income differences?

0
Posted

Doesn’t causality go in the opposite direction – more social problems leading to wider income differences?

0

From time to time changes on income distribution may be triggered by new governments with different philosophies or economic theories. This happened in a number of countries when monetarism and neo-liberal ideas became common during the 1980s. Legislation was introduced to weaken trade union powers and changes in taxes and benefits were introduced which contributed to a widening in income differences. However, although it can be said that a change in political and economic ideology contributed to widening income differences, there is no doubt that governments did not intend to weaken community life or to increase levels of violence, teenage birth rates, drug abuse or any of the other problems which go with greater inequality. These were all unintended consequences of widening income differences. Nor can an increase in health and social problems be the cause of widening income differences. As we have seen, a wide range of health and social problems tend to move together – countries whic

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.