Fantastico installs Xoops in a subdirectory. Will this be any different from installing Xoops in the root directory as far as performance?
jdseymour Posted: 2005/6/9 5:15 Updated: 2005/6/9 5:15 Friend of XOOPSJoined: 2004/11/11From: Gainesville, Florida, USAPosts: 3701 Re: subdirectoryNo difference in performance, just in the URL. If you want your XOOPS site at http://www.yoursite.com , install it in the root or the site. If installed in a subdirectory, unless mapped as a subdomain, the URL would be http://www.yoursite.com/subdirectory . The Web site functions the same though. broadcircle Posted: 2005/6/9 9:27 Updated: 2005/6/9 9:27 Just popping inJoined: 2005/3/25From: Oregon, USAPosts: 56 Re: subdirectoryGreat. Thanks. steros01 Posted: 2006/1/10 9:05 Updated: 2006/1/10 9:05 Just popping inJoined: 2006/1/10From: Posts: 1 405 POST not supportedI’ve recently installed XOOPS using Fantastico but when I login, I get only this error message: 405 POST not supported Resin 2.1.14 (built Thu Jul 1 18:39:55 PDT 2004) I can’t tell the xoops version but the file timestamp is Aug 15, 2005.
Related Questions
- Why does the IFC have a different set of environmental and social Performance Standards from the World Bank, and how do they differ from the World Bank safeguard policies?
- Fantastico installs Xoops in a subdirectory. Will this be any different from installing Xoops in the root directory as far as performance?
- What makes Jewish Millionaire.com different from any other website?
