Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Fired from the Borg! Can I get Unemployment Insurance in MA?

0
10 Posted

Fired from the Borg! Can I get Unemployment Insurance in MA?

0
10

My experience working in HR (in Wisconsin) tells me that unemployment is a crazy, crazy system. We’ve fired employees with multiple attendance warnings who have gotten UI (court argued we couldn’t prove they weren’t sick when they were out of the office, despite a clear attendance policy) and fired employees with less ‘evidence’ that have been denied UI. Apply for it and see what happens. My guess is if your boss isn’t concerned that you divulged any company information, s/he may ‘forget’ to respond to the UI charge and you’ll get your money. You lose nothing by applying and getting it denied. If you can prove that your non-work activities didn’t occur on work time, you’ll have a better shot of winning. Also, chalk it up to a lesson learned that if you disagree with company policy, work to change it, change your actions or seek other employment. Good luck!

0

You were fired for cause and will not be eligible for unemployment insurance as determined by state law. Sorry. This is completely wrong. It ignores the words of the statute, applicable case law, and the burden of proof required by the employer. Please don’t give armchair legal advice.

0
10

You were fired for cause and will not be eligible for unemployment insurance as determined by state law. Sorry. In practice, the only way MA would know this is by the employer contesting unemployment. Since the employer is not contesting unemployment, then the asker will very likely be eligible for unemployment insurance. Who knows what the “official” reason the employer decided on for his termination.

0
10

Bostonian here. Through friends/acquaintances, I’ve heard of HR at different companies “fire” someone, but file it as a layoff officially so they can collect. It’s kind of a nicer gesture seen for longer term employees who screwed up and had to be terminated under company policy, but didn’t fuck up severely as to have criminal charges pressed against them. I’ve also known of people who were just fired, were not given the assurance of “we won’t contest unemployment insurance” and still were able to collect. Don’t ask me how or why, just one of the many nonsensical joys of Massachusetts. Apply for it. They said they won’t contest it. Worst case scenario, you are denied unemployment benefits. Best case scenario, you have an unemployment check.

0

Is it possible to assume that everyone on MetaFilter is not a lawyer unless they state otherwise? Since you said “financial services company,” I’m going to assume this is a company subject to data retention and monitoring laws/rules. Therefore, the company policy you violated may be rather severe because they need to monitor all of the information coming into or going out of their network and that’s the primary reason personal e-mail is blocked. Either way, using utilities to bypass firewall/policy restrictions is usually a Bad Thing(tm), regardless the reason though in this case your employer likely had these in place because getting slapped with a huge fine for failing to follow those laws isn’t worth it. I’m not saying you should be some uncaring automaton who exists solely for the working pleasure of your employers, but the people who pay you do have the expectation that their policies will be followed, even if you don’t agree with or understand the reasoning. Therefore, you will p

Related Questions

Thanksgiving questions

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.