Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Frequently Asked Questions Why does APRAIS seek to eliminate the use of aversive procedures, seclusion, and non-emergency restraint?

0
Posted

Frequently Asked Questions Why does APRAIS seek to eliminate the use of aversive procedures, seclusion, and non-emergency restraint?

0

• Aversive procedures, seclusion and non-emergency restraint are now recognized to be dangerous; leading to injury, death and trauma. • These procedures are still being used as part of treatment plans though no evidence exists for therapeutic value. It is widely accepted that restraint is not treatment; it is the failure of treatment. • The use of restraint, with the exception of brief physical intervention when someone is at imminent risk of hurting himself or others violates 8th and 14th amendment protections. • Statutes and regulations are outdated, confusing, uncoordinated, and protect some while others remain at risk.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.