Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Has the notion of a settlement become redundant especially since the Hindutva adherents sense victory?

0
Posted

Has the notion of a settlement become redundant especially since the Hindutva adherents sense victory?

0

I wouldn’t say it is becoming redundant because of the proposal to have a mosque and a mandir adjacent to each other! When this kind of a proposal was under discussion in 1991-1992 the Hindu parties were opposed to the mosque remaining adjacent to the temple. They were prepared to make all efforts to honourably move the mosque, but it would have to be 8, 10 kilometres away. Now, according to the court’s decision, the mosque will be next door to the temple. But I am still not sure if it is acceptable to the Hindu parties unless the Supreme Court upholds the same view. Will the high court verdict make a different Supreme Court verdict — if that happens — difficult to accept for those cheering Thursday’s judgment and who have previously stated that courts cannot rule on matters of faith? If we have all matured as a democracy and if we have moved on in the real sense of the term, then the Supreme Court’s decision — whether one likes it or not — is binding on everyone. And all the respo

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.