Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Hasn’t it been shown that countries without natural resources – like many of those in East Asia – have been more successful economically than those with natural resources?

0
Posted

Hasn’t it been shown that countries without natural resources – like many of those in East Asia – have been more successful economically than those with natural resources?

0

Yes, some people argue this. And it is true that the performance of some countries in exploiting their mineral resources has been disappointing (although this is not generally the case with gold). But the research that appeared to demonstrate that exploiting natural resources is not a good route for developing countries has been challenged in a number of quarters. Importantly it is based on only one period of history (1970 to 1990) and ignores the fuller historical record when there is clear evidence, starting with the UK at the time of the industrial revolution, that exploiting mineral resources helps development. Gold mining was of major importance in the development of California and other parts of the American West, Australia and, of course, South Africa. More recently countries such as Chile, Malaysia and Botswana have used mineral resources successfully to stimulate more general growth. We do not know all the answers but it seems that quality of governance is a key factor in ensu

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.