Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

How accurate was Friedans portrayal of American women held prisoner by the feminine mystique?

0
Posted

How accurate was Friedans portrayal of American women held prisoner by the feminine mystique?

0

ALICE KESSLER-HARRIS: One could certainly say that Betty Friedan’s Feminine Mystique spoke to the lives of middle-class women far more than it spoke to the lives of other women; that is, ordinary women, working-class women, had always worked, if not full-time, then part-time. If they hadn’t gone out to work, they had figured out a way to make money, stretch incomes in their home roles. Still, I think it’s important to note that the kinds of women that Betty Friedan was talking about are not a small number of women in the 1950s. And because the suburban lifestyle is spreading in the 1950s, she spoke to a kind of breakdown of community, of urban community life, as well as to a shift in family values that was occurring in that period. You might want to call it middle class, but I think it was enormously important nonetheless. QUESTION: Why did the feminist movement of the 1960s occur when it did? ALICE KESSLER-HARRIS: I think that it emerged as strongly as it did because the proportions o

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.