How come other research studies do not reach the same conclusions?
Most research studies explore the spiritual dimension and its effects on man with conventional tools of research while the SSRF uses the medium of the activated sixth sense. Using conventional research methodologies to explore the spiritual realm is like trying to measure intelligence with a foot ruler. At best, this type of research can only be corroborative in nature rather than first hand research into the etiology of phenomena in the spiritual realm. What the mind/brain does not know, it will not seek to corroborate. Since all research conducted by the SSRF is through the medium of the activated sixth sense, it does not face the restrictions of conventional research methodologies. Hence the research conclusions are bound to be different. 4.
Related Questions
- How do I take into account rules such as those for research staff who once they reach a certain age, and receive a Phd, have to be paid a minimum scale and point?
- Did the study authors in the 2008 Neurology article reach incorrect conclusions?
- How come other research studies do not reach the same conclusions?
