|
A LETS system allows people to keep a single balance of their debts with the community as a whole. The problem is that any member of the community can grant credit on behalf of the entire community in order to receive payment. This puts people in the position of granting credit to those who are not necessarily going to repay, but still being able to claim payment on that debt from others in the community. The result is that the community currency slowly devalues and the system runs out of steam. Successful LETS systems avoid this with active centralized management to ensure that everyone does their part to make good on their debts – just like a bank with a friendly loan policy. Ripple avoids allowing participants to benefit from wrongly granting credit to those who won't repay, by keeping track of credit only between pairs of participants, and never with the nebulous "community as a whole". Anyone who grants credit that is not repaid is fully liable for that debt. It's as if you ...
more
|
How is Ripple different from a LETS system?
Related Questions
- Ripple was inspired by the LETS concept and the writings of Michael Linton, and was conceived originally as a ...
- Ripple wine was a kind of fortified wine that was famous during the 1970's. It was produced in the United ...
- I think the Sensations Ripple yarn is no longer sold, so you might have problems finding patterns ...
- Mark Ripple is a former stockbroker and freelance writer for American Turf Monthly magazine. More can be ...
- the ripple scripts are activated at random, the prompts tell you everything you need to know about the nature ...