Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

How sensitive are final parameters on initial input parameters?

0
Posted

How sensitive are final parameters on initial input parameters?

0

One frequent concern regarding image fitting is the fear that the initial guesses may sensitively affect the final parameters. This concern was alleviated early on in plots circulated internally which showed that the initial guesses for the effective radii for GALFIT, derived from SExtractor catalog values, bore either no correlation or had a huge scatter compared to the simulated galaxy parameters (Figure 2). Yet GALFIT converged on the known solutions in the end (compare Figure 2 with Figures 3 and 4). So insensitive is the code to initial inputs that even though they are often off by one to two orders of magnitude, especially for n=4 galaxies, the final scatter is only of order 0.1 dex. This is all the more striking when considering the fact that 50% of all the simulated objects have nearby neighbors, all of whom would also have quite crude initial parameters. The strong convergence behavior is not just in the effective radius parameter, but also for all the other free parameters. H

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.