How will the scientific reviewers for this RFA be identified? Is it appropriate for the applicant to suggest reviewers? Can the applicant recommend against specific reviewers?
Regarding reviewer identification, the scientific review administrator (SRA) develops an “expertise list” for each application, and uses literature searches and other approaches to identify potential reviewers with expertise in the specialties of each application; the assembled group of reviewers so identified constitutes the unique special emphasis panel (SEP) that evaluates the scientific merit of the applications submitted in response to this RFA. Regarding suggesting reviewers, although as part of the general discussions that applicants may have with NIH Program staff while developing their application, types of reviewers and unusual aspects of the application may be discussed, it is not appropriate for the applicant to recommend specific reviewers since this may generate conflicts of interest.
Related Questions
- How will the scientific reviewers for this RFA be identified? Is it appropriate for the applicant to suggest reviewers? Can the applicant recommend against specific reviewers?
- If an applicant has no experience in programming and has a business background would you recommend the MSIT eBusiness program?
- Is it appropriate for an applicant to budget funds for direct support from CDC-identified technical assistance providers?
