Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

I notice that e-mail addresses have been added to the IDR Contact Sheet (ARS-570) format. Is it OK to use e-mail for IDR factfinding?

0
Posted

I notice that e-mail addresses have been added to the IDR Contact Sheet (ARS-570) format. Is it OK to use e-mail for IDR factfinding?

0

E-mail addresses were added to the ARS-570 on the RPES Advisory Committee’s recommendation, after numerous suggestions to do so were received from scientists and panelists across ARS. The primary reason for adding e-mail addresses was to provide an alternative to “telephone tag” as a tool for scheduling telephone interviews with contacts. So, it is certainly OK to use e-mail to arrange mutually convenient interview times. It is not OK to conduct factfinding interviews by e-mail. E-mail was never intended as a substitute for oral interviews. Neither e-mail nor any other form of written communication should ever be considered as a primary means of factfinding. There are two reasons for this. First, the RPES confidentiality principle can be easily breached when questions are asked and answers given via e-mail. Second, and perhaps more importantly, e-mail based factfinding is almost certain to be less useful than a personal interview. Spontaneity and flexibility in directing the interview

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.