Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

If I want to increase the total exposure time, is it more efficient to increase the number of coadds or do additional exposures/readouts?

0
Posted

If I want to increase the total exposure time, is it more efficient to increase the number of coadds or do additional exposures/readouts?

0

A. Increasing the number of coadds is the best way in terms of efficiency (smaller overheads) but it is not the recommended method. Rather, you should consider increasing the number of repeats. The reason for doing this are 2: 1) if you use multiple coadds and have one bad exposure for some reason, it will affect all the coadded exposures, and 2) you will have longer time between the individual raw frames being written, so you’ll have less frequent visual feedback on the data acquisition while observing. Finally, if you combine a long sequence of coadds with a long sequence of jittering, you might end up not sampling the sky frequently enough.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.