If the zoning requires a minimum parcel size of 5 acres to split off as a residential parcel, why can I use that acreage criterion as the land “necessary for the location & convenience” of the agricultural improvements, especially when the agricultural buildings include a residence?
• A 40-acre parcel classed as Agricultural (Class 4) in 2005 sold during that year. The property was re-zoned residential and a subdivision approval was granted before January 1, 2006. As of June 2006, the parcel was covered with last year’s stubble. Do the earlier activities indicating a future use change and the lack of use in agricultural meet the rule’s criteria of “incompatible with agricultural use”?
Related Questions
- If the zoning requires a minimum parcel size of 5 acres to split off as a residential parcel, why can I use that acreage criterion as the land "necessary for the location & convenience" of the agricultural improvements, especially when the agricultural buildings include a residence?
- If a parcel is split, how is the size calculated in determining which Conversion Charge to apply?
- What is the minimum rock sample size Ingrain requires to be able to conduct its analyses?
