Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is 16mm (24mm DSLR) good enough for landscape photography?

September 22, 2021digital camera DSLR forum good landscape pentax photography SLR

0

Posted

Is 16mm (24mm DSLR) good enough for landscape photography?

2 Answers

0

Saturnny 2 Posted

Hi! I’m not a photographer, I can’t tell you. But I know one blog gtwn.net on which there is a lot of useful information on this topic and it seems to me that there you will find the answer to your question. I recommend that you visit this blog and see what is interesting and useful there. Good luck!

0

Posted

DJey, the 24mm focal length was one of the classic landscape FLs in 35mm film photography. Many landscape pros favored that FL’s FOV (field of view), which generally was right on the borderline of noticeable barrel distortion at the edges of the frame; just fine if you weren’t shooting nearby vertical architectural scenes or lots of Ponderosa pines/Douglas firs/Redwoods. The 16mm equivalent on an APS-C DSLR fills many of the same photographic purposes, which accounts for its modern popularity, I suppose.