Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

is a 300-microm stromal bed enough?

bed stromal
0
Posted

is a 300-microm stromal bed enough?

0

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla, USA. stuli@ufl.eduPURPOSE: To report a case of ectasia occurring > 4 years following LASIK with no risk factors and a residual stromal bed > 300 microm. METHODS: A 33-year-old woman presented 4 years after LASIK with mild blurring in the left eye. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) had been 20/20 in both eyes previously. RESULTS: Uncorrected visual acuity was 20/20 and 20/40 in the right and left eyes, respectively. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) was 20/20 with -0.75 +2.25 x 70 degrees refraction in the left eye, which matched topography. Preoperative corneal thickness was 595 microm, and topography showed no risk factors preoperatively or immediately postoperatively. Calculated residual stromal bed was 342 microm and measured 400 microm with ultrasound microscopy. One year postoperatively, UCVA decreased to 20/400, and BSCVA decreased to 20/60 with refraction of -4.50 +5.00 x 90 degrees. The patient wa

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.