Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is a bicuspid aortic valve a risk factor for adverse outcome after an autograft procedure?

0
Posted

Is a bicuspid aortic valve a risk factor for adverse outcome after an autograft procedure?

0

GROUND: Recently, bicuspid aortic valve disease is posed to be a possible risk factor for dilatation of the pulmonary autograft. METHODS: Analysis of all 123 patients in our prospective cohort with their native aortic valve in situ at the autograft procedure. RESULTS: The bicuspid aortic valve group (n = 81) had more males (p = 0.05), prior cardiac surgery (p = 0.02), prior aortic valve balloon dilatation (p = 0.01), aortic stenosis (p = 0.03), and less deterioration of left ventricular function (p = 0.02) than the tricuspid group (n = 42). Hospital mortality occurred in 3 patients (bicuspid 2, tricuspid 1). The follow-up was 99% complete (median, 5.3 years; SD, 3.5; range, 0.1 to 13.4) with a total of 674 patient years. During follow-up 4 patients died (bicuspid 2, tricuspid 2). Overall survival was 95% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89% to 98%) at 5 and 10 years. Seven patients required reoperation for autograft failure, all structural. Freedom from autograft reintervention was 97% (

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.