Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is a calibrated model legitimate to use for analyzing what happened in other years, or what will happen with different dam-release alternatives?

0
Posted

Is a calibrated model legitimate to use for analyzing what happened in other years, or what will happen with different dam-release alternatives?

0

A25. As with any model, one s confidence in the results grows after demonstrating that the model performs well over the range of conditions you may expect to find, or even to predict. But one strength of a model is to predict things you cannot easily measure. Being a physically based model that has been used in a variety of circumstances, I can safely say that SNTEMP predicts well, generally less than 0.5 C on average and less than 1.5 C most of the time, given representative input data. If it predicts generally within these bounds, relative temperature changes that one can expect from a variety of management actions in other year types may be used as good guidance. However, models are always wrong to some degree, so setting the model at risk is a wise idea. I.E., keep your eye on it.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.