Is global warming the result of natural phenomenon or human activity?; and 4) Is the prescribed cure for global warming worse than the disease?
Perhaps the most important, most fundamental question of all is whether life would be better with or without global warming. Question #1: Would life be better with or without global warming? After world leaders meet in Kyoto, Japan this December, billions of people may face a bleaker future than they do today. The principal threat comes not from the possibility that the international community will fail to adopt a plan to control global warming, but that it will actually succeed in doing so. The Benefits of Global Warming According to the World Bank, one-third of the world’s population already suffers from chronic water shortages. The Worldwatch Institute predicts that this situation will be exacerbated further by the addition of an estimated 2.6 billion people to the world’s population over the next 30 years. By 2025, the group claims, some three billion people — or 40% of the world’s population — could be living in countries without sufficient water supplies, leading to crop failur
Related Questions
- Is global warming the result of natural phenomenon or human activity?; and 4) Is the prescribed cure for global warming worse than the disease?
- What do I say when a scientist claims that his model shows global warming from human activity?
- Is global warming the result of natural phenomena or human activity?
