Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is High-Stakes Standardized Testing Defensible?

0
Posted

Is High-Stakes Standardized Testing Defensible?

0

YES: Richard P. Phelps: “Why Testing Experts Hate Testing,” Fordham Report. NO: Peter Sacks: “Standardized Testing: Meritocracy’s Crooked Yardstick,” Change. Journalist Richard P. Phelps suggests that the criticisms directed at high-stakes standardized testing are misguided and do not hold up upon careful scrutiny. Peter Sacks, a journalist and essayist on education and American culture, argues that the penchant for high-stakes testing is counterproductive to meaningful teaching and learning and thus harmful to students.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.