Is Implicit Learning Spared in Amnesia?
D SHANKS & S CHANNON, University College London. We examined implicit learning of an artificial grammar in amnesic and control participants. The “biconditional” grammar used to generate study and test strings allows two potential sources of judgments in artificial grammar learning to be unconfounded: Participants could either learn the abstract biconditional rules or could learn about the distributional statistics of the surface elements (e.g., bigrams) composing the study items. Test strings varied these two sources orthogonally. We found no evidence of abstract rule learning either in the control or amnesic groups. In contrast, both groups learned about the surface elements and tended to call test strings “grammatical” when they were composed of familiar bigrams. However, this sensitivity to bigram familiarity was significantly reduced in the amnesic compared to the control group. The results challenge the claim that implicit learning is intact in amnesia.
Related Questions
- Is there postoperative evidence of implicit learning following aural stimuli at moderate hypnotic BIS levels during general anesthesia?
- Does implicit learning in non-demented Parkinsons disease depend on the level of cognitive functioning?
- How Do We Find Words In Implicit Artificial Language Learning?
