Is it anti Semitic to mention the 220 children killed in Gaza?
You know, technically, it’s not, because Gazzans are Semites too. I’m not gonna debate with anyone who is right and who is wrong, I’m going to be more mature than that and stick with his, albeit rhetorical, question. So you all can take your thumbs down and shove them up your asses, because even Wikipedia agrees with me. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semite Edit: You misspelled my name Paperback Writer. How thoughtless of you (My god, I just know that now you’re going to go through all my answers ever and give them thumbs down). And anyway, your argument against me rather futile as no matter from what point you look at it, the phrase “Israel has been responsible for 220 children’s deaths in Gaza” isn’t anti-Semetic. I am aware the term “anti-Semite” is used to refer to being anti-Jewish, however, the term Semite represents more than just the Jews. So, if you look at it, a Semite is allowed to be “anti-Semetic”, the same so
No. But it would be fairer if you also noted the THOUSANDS of dead Israelis, including hundreds of children, courtesy of Hamas suicide bombings and missiles. http://www.shoebat.com http://www.honestreporting.com Just to educate DENTON: – the term ‘anti semitism’ was coined by a NON Jew, William Marr, in a bid to ‘legitimise’ his own hatred of Jews and his writing on the topic. The phrase has always meant hatred of Jews, and has always been used to mean that. MISTY BLUE – yeah, their ‘cushy’ lives in BUNKERS 24-7. Get real. You’ve never even stepped foot on Israeli soil.
