Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is it true that fluorescence is sensitive enough to detect single atoms and molecules?

0
Posted

Is it true that fluorescence is sensitive enough to detect single atoms and molecules?

0

Yes, but only in particular circumstances which can not always be achieved in a useful manner. To understand the subtleties a very simple calculation is useful. Consider a fluorophore with the following typical properties: Quantum yield for fluorescence=0.1 (i.e. a photon is emitted once every ten excitations on average. Many labels have higher quantum yields than 0.1) Quantum yield for photobleaching=0.0001 (i.e. on average the molecule decomposes after 10,000 excitations. Many labels are substantially more photostable than this) These figures tell us that a single molecule of our hypothetical label will (on average) emit 1000 photons if it is repeatedly excited until it is bleached irreversibly. The emitted photons must be collected by a lens, optically filtered to reject exciting light and detected by a sensor. Each of these processes introduces significant losses. Combining these reduces the overall detected signal substantially. Overall efficiency is usually in the range 1-5% or m

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.