Is it true that the EZLN is not willing to have any period or comma of the “Cocopa Law” changed?
In the current debate no one is suggesting that the problem with the “Cocopa Law” has to do with periods and commas. The attacks on the law are directed at its fundamental aspects (autonomy of the Indian peoples, territoriality, collective rights), not at mere problems of wording. By defending the “Cocopa Law”, the EZLN is defending the San Andre’s Accords, which reflect the demands of the Indian peoples of Mexico.
