Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is PVL positive S. aureus dangerous?

aureus dangerous positive pvl
0
Posted

Is PVL positive S. aureus dangerous?

0

S. aureus strains that are positive for PVL, and especially epidemic strains of PVL CA-MRSA, have an increased ability to cause spontaneous infection and recurrent disease as compared to toxin negative S. aureus strains. Most of these infections are superficial skin infection such as a boil or skin abscess. These tend to heal spontaneously or heal after incision and drainage. Thus, most infections caused by PVL S. aureus are not dangerous. However, a correct diagnosis is important since (i) recurrence of infection and spread between members of a household or close contacts is a common feature of epidemic PVL CA-MRSA, (ii) the recurrent boils are unpleasant, and (iii) the identification of MRSA would help to avoid the use of ineffective antibiotics. Rarely, PVL positive S. aureus causes severe and life-threatening infection such as pneumonia in previously healthy adults and children. Once such a severe infection has developed, the fatality rate is high. Fatalities in previously healthy

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.