Is the decision compatible with county government, state agencies and goals of Indian tribes?
I considered comments received from public agencies, Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, and elected officials in my decision making process. Based upon these comments, I have made a comparison between my Selected Alternative, and the goals and concerns expressed by the following: Shoshone – Bannock Tribes – The analysis considered effects to forest access for the Shoshone-Bannock Tribal members (FEIS, Chapter 4). Staff members for the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes have indicated that the Revised Caribou Travel Plan is compatible with their goals. The Shoshone-Bannock Tribe has ancestral Treaty Rights on the public domain lands reserved for National Forest purposes administered by the Caribou-Targhee National Forest. The relationship of the United States government with American Indian tribes is based on legal agreements between sovereign nations. The Fort Bridger Treaty of July 3, 1868 reserved hunting and fishing rights for Tribal members on “…all unoccupied lands of the United States.” Consultation
Related Questions
- My local city or county government has already required that I be trained for off premise sales of alcohol. How does this State law effect my certification and do I need to be retrained?
- Is the decision compatible with county government, state agencies and goals of Indian tribes?
- What is the role of state government with regard to Indian Tribes?
