Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is there a need for Committee on Human Research (CHR) review of proposed research at UCSF if an investigator intends to work on Human Embryonic Stem Cells (HESC)?

0
Posted

Is there a need for Committee on Human Research (CHR) review of proposed research at UCSF if an investigator intends to work on Human Embryonic Stem Cells (HESC)?

0

Yes. The CHR is UCSF’s Institutional Review Board (IRB). California Law requires IRB approval for any research involving derivation and use of human embryonic stem cells, human embryonic germ cells, and human adult stem cells from any source, including somatic cell nuclear transplantation. CHR review is needed even for uses of human stem cells that might be exempt from IRB review under Federal law. If an investigator (at UCSF) receives human embryos or HESC from another investigator (or institution), what obligation does the receiving investigator have to ensure that the consent obtained by the sending institution is adequate? It is important to respect donors’ wishes, whether they donate embryos no longer needed for assisted reproduction or donate the oocytes or sperm that are used to create the embryos. Generally researchers are not expected to verify IRB review and adequate consent when they receive established, commercially available, de-identified cell lines. For almost all other

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.