Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is there has been in the last days/mounthes new cases in subject of juvenile/under-age arrest?

0
Posted

Is there has been in the last days/mounthes new cases in subject of juvenile/under-age arrest?

0

Answer Dear Hilla: There are, unfortunately, constant arrests of young offenders and suspects. The case most in the news is Roper v. Simmons, which is a death penalty case from Missouri, involving a murderer who was 17 when he committed the capital murder. The case has been accepted by the US Supreme Court to consider, again, the constitutionality of 16-17 year old murderers being eligible for the death penalty. Personally, I believe that some 16-17 year olds should be eligible for death. The standard areguements against making them eligible for the death penalty are quite weak, see below. However, I don’t think that those basic arguments will come into the final decison. I think the decison will be based on the evolving standards issue. Sincerely, Dudley Sharp Why Some “Juvenile” Murderers Should Qualify For The Death Penalty: Brain Science and Other Issues Dudley Sharp There are a number of inadequate issues raised in opposition to 16-17 year old murderers being culpable for the deat

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.