Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is there still a role for spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions?

0
Posted

Is there still a role for spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions?

0

Joel Lexchin Joel Lexchin is associate professor, School of Health Policy and Management, York University; emergency physician, University Health Network; and associate professor, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. Correspondence to: Dr. Joel Lexchin, 121 Walmer Rd., Toronto ON M5R 2X8; jlexchin{at}yorku.ca’ + u + ‘@’ + d + ”//–> In an age of large, linked databases, is there still a role for a system of spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions? The problems associated with reports are well-known: poor quality of submitted reports; significant underreporting of adverse reactions; difficulty in calculating rates because of incomplete numerator data along with unreliable denominators; and limited ability to establish cause and effect.1 In this commentary I discuss the importance of reporting adverse reactions and possible ways to increase the rate of reporting. How to analyze signals that are generated through reporting and what act

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.