Isnt it risky that the gains, at the cost level, are minimized because of the time taken in launch and follow up which can be long?
There is indeed a time required for a pre audit (1 week in the majority of cases) which would allow the company to identify the optimization points in its organization, which is not therefore lost time from this point of view so far as the duration of the tasks will be reduced by the rationalization of the process (gain of time delay). Next is to the delay in start up which is of few weeks (4 to 6 weeks in general). As for running-in, we have observed that it is all the more shorter than the perimeters of intervention and process that were well defined at the preparatory phase and that the control procedures adapted to the complexity of tasks are available. In all the cases, the time taken in start-up is soon compensated by the productivity gains generated by the optimized process.
Related Questions
- The argument usually goes: Skills cost more when they are at a higher level, and most of the time, they don give the same mana/damage efficiency as lower levels. So why max skills at all?
- Can we restrict some timekeeper access to client files and other information and basically restrict them to recording time and cost entries?
- How do I request an appointment in the future (e.g. 3 months time) for a patient who needs a follow up scan?
