Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Opponents say the language used for Prop 105 is misleading. How so?

0
10 Posted

Opponents say the language used for Prop 105 is misleading. How so?

0

Prop 105 states that “to protect the will of the people of Arizona for fiscal responsibility through true majority rule, any initiative that imposes additional taxes or spending must have support from a majority of qualified electors in Arizona.” A “majority of qualified electors” sounds nice, but in reality it means ALL REGISTERED VOTERS. The wording is misleading in that the proponents want people who don’t vote to have a say in the outcome of an election. This is NOT the way a true majority is determined. This is not the American way. A true majority is reached by counting votes that are cast, not those that are not.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.