Please address these questions specific to the 1147 and 1149 – where do the users address the allegations from the petition which are usually different than what were listed on the 307?
At the end of the CPS assessment an Ongoing Safety Plan is developed only when there are identified safety threats that are unmanaged. The wording on petitions should be similar to the safety threats identified because the unmanaged safety threats are the reason the child is unsafe and the reason for the petition. So, the appropriate answer to “State the safety threats that were identified in the CPS assessment to which the child was vulnerable and for which there was insufficient parental protective capacity” is the identified, unmanaged safety threats. These unmanaged safety threats are what require continued Child Welfare intervention (and juvenile court involvement) to occur as well as the development of the Ongoing Safety Plan. If the case was open prior to 3/20/07, the new safety threats should be applied and clearly documented in the Action Agreement (1147) and the Ongoing Safety Plan (1149).
Related Questions
- Please address these questions specific to the 1147 and 1149 - where do the users address the allegations from the petition which are usually different than what were listed on the 307?
- What if a merchant on the Master Payee List has a different billing address than the one I usually use when sending my payment?
- What are the different access levels to my status information for users on the Global Address List and how do I change this?
