Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

rather for Vic?

April 26, 2017vic

0

Posted

rather for Vic?

1 Answer

0

Posted

Is it possible that a small amount of free product could be in the samples? Also, it seems to me that it could be possible that the solubility is different because of the other chemicals present. However, I would have expected the solubility to decrease, not increase, because of Raoult’s Law for mixtures. Solubility values reported in the literature vary quite a bit for some chemicals. I used the EPA’s Soil Screening Guidance (SSG) for the default solubility values in RISC. This is a fairly recent, “peer-reviewed” source and many of the States here are using the chemical values from this document as defaults in their RBCA programs. (I’m not sure it is the best source however.