Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Should governments recognise the religious rite of human sacrifice as legal, sane, meaningful and effective?

0
10 Posted

Should governments recognise the religious rite of human sacrifice as legal, sane, meaningful and effective?

0
10

Jesus may have died for peoples sins but the time of his death was 2000 years ago under a completely different view on life and ways of living. In the Art of war by Tsun Tsu we are told that a true believer in religion has to evolve with the times as many years ago we may have seen a sacrifice as a giving of blood to our deities or other beliefs but as we move through time and time changes our civilisation we then see that sacrifice now means personal sacrifices rather than blood. The religious documents are no more in date and the sooner we realise this we will see human sacrifice does not prove anything…

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.